Winter Vacation Scheme Student Review

by Hogan Lovells

This review was submitted over 4 years ago, so some of the information it contains may no longer be relevant.

Rating

4.2/5
  • About You
    4.4
  • The Company
    4.1
  • Everything Else
    4.3

    About You

  • 1. To what extent did you enjoy the insight?
  • I enjoyed the experience of meeting my future colleagues and experiencing life within the law firm. Although a couple of weeks is not representative of life as a trainee, it was valuable to understand how day to day operations were conducted and it was a great way to meet other students.

    4/5

  • 2. To what extent did you feel valued during your time at the company or firm?
  • As a vac scheme student, our time was very structured around various presentations and meetings, but enough time was left to work independently on tasks set by supervisors. Both of my supervisors made me feel valued and looped me into the work they were doing to help me understand it.

    4/5

  • 3. How much guidance/support did you receive during the insight?
  • We were given many opportunities to talk to trainees and other employees about their experience within the firm, and I found that everyone was very happy to meet. During these meetings I was given a lot of guidance and advice that helped me choose the firm as my top choice.

    5/5

  • 4. To what extent did/will the skills you developed, and information you received, assist you in your degree studies and beyond?
  • I don't believe the vac scheme had much of an impact in my future work or studies, since this was too short a time to learn new skills. However, I did get a good insight into the commercial realities of working in a law firm that helped me in my next job.

    5/5

    The Company

  • 5. How well structured was the insight?
  • The vac scheme was well structured because it gave enough of a solid timetable whilst allowing flexibility to work independently and network. The scheduling of networking evenings could have been better if they had been done later on in the weeks, since some vac schemers lived far away and couldn't stay out late.

    5/5

  • 6. How was the general atmosphere during your insight?
  • The atmosphere was quite nice and relaxed because it was nearing the Christmas break and everyone was therefore relatively free to meet. The interactions with the other vac schemers was fun too and there wasn't a sense of malicious competition, everyone was very collaborative. The trainees were also more relaxed and took us out to lunch to welcome us.

    5/5

  • 7. In terms of personal training and development, to what extent did the company or firm invest in you?
  • A huge amount - once I was offered the training contract they paid my law school and some money each year to contribute to maintenance costs. However, there could be more investment in the cohorts as a whole, who don't meet each other formally until the LPC.

    4/5

  • 8. To what extent did the insight help you to understand what it would be like to have a full time role with the company or firm?
  • This was an important part of the interview, and it was made clear that a large part of the work entailed relatively dull processes. This was important in my decision because I valued the honesty of my coworkers and they also highlighted the fun aspects of the job.

    4/5

  • 9. How much did the insight help you in understanding the company culture?
  • A lot - the fact that people were so willing to talk and advise me demonstrated the friendliness of the firm. It was also valuable to see the expectations placed on trainees and vac schemers, since it was clear that there was a strong emphasis on work-life balance.

    5/5

  • 10. How valuable was the content in helping you to decide on your future career path?
  • It was relatively useful to help me choose my career path. However, my insight into an alternative career helped me more because it was longer and I was given more realistic tasks of the everyday. It may be worth extending the programme to include a week of 'real' work experience without timetabled presentations to simulate the realities of work.

    3/5

    Everything Else

  • 11. Were you paid or reimbursed adequately for this experience?
  • Yes - we were paid very reasonably for the two weeks. I had no expenses, but those that did were reimbursed.


  • 12. Were there opportunities for networking and meeting other employees of the company or firm?
  • Yes, many - we had scheduled evenings designed specifically to interact with trainees, and several lunches to network with partners. It was also strongly recommended that we contact people to meet for coffee, and this was always responded to quickly and positively.

    5/5

  • 13. How were the networking/ social event opportunities?
  • The networking and social events were nice, and reflected the firm's culture. These events were very similar compared to other vac schemes. My only comment would be to maintain an event a year for future trainees in order to keep a stronger contact with the firm.

    4/5

  • 14. Did you find out about activities that employees can get involved in outside of work?
  • There was less emphasis on this than in previous work experiences I participated in, but the amenities of the office were highlighted to us (especially the gym). It was clear however that most colleagues had hobbies and activities outside of work that they did together, even if this was not necessarily under the umbrella of the firm.

    4/5

  • 15. Would you recommend this insight to a friend?
  • Yes - generally a useful experience that gives a good insight into both the culture and the work of the firm. The weeks were well structured and balanced to help vac schemers decide whether they were suited to the firm, as well as being assessed.

    5/5

    Report this review

Details

Insight / Vacation Scheme (< 4 Weeks)

London

April 2019


View More Reviews